From af6fdc081395cd540d7f9eb6008de20e87551c52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: david Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 21:03:28 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: needs update-initramfs --- .../comment_2_25a2911fa57ea3da20f25b25d7c4406b._comment | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/__34__predictable__34___network_interface_names/comment_2_25a2911fa57ea3da20f25b25d7c4406b._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/forum/__34__predictable__34___network_interface_names/comment_2_25a2911fa57ea3da20f25b25d7c4406b._comment b/doc/forum/__34__predictable__34___network_interface_names/comment_2_25a2911fa57ea3da20f25b25d7c4406b._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e284c8f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/__34__predictable__34___network_interface_names/comment_2_25a2911fa57ea3da20f25b25d7c4406b._comment @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="david" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/22c2d800db6a7699139df604a67cb221" + subject="needs update-initramfs" + date="2018-10-14T21:03:28Z" + content=""" +I guess that's a more productive line of thinking, I wouldn't expect these vm's to have more than one network interface. One gotcha that took a bit to figure out is that the masking needs update-initramfs to be seen at boot. The following seems to be working for me: + +[[!format haskell \"\"\" +& File.hasContent \"/etc/systemd/network/99-default.link\" [] + `onChange` ( Cmd.cmdProperty \"update-initramfs\" [\"-u\"] `changesFile` \"/initrd.img\" ) +\"\"\"]] +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From e58e047c0b19523fda0494efb9672e9b4b5cbe9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: david Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:51:23 +0000 Subject: Added a comment: maybe some equivalent of CryptPassword --- .../comment_3_a749abb97ebafd26bb695663b68673c5._comment | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/dm-crypt__47__LUKS_encryption_and_key_management/comment_3_a749abb97ebafd26bb695663b68673c5._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/forum/dm-crypt__47__LUKS_encryption_and_key_management/comment_3_a749abb97ebafd26bb695663b68673c5._comment b/doc/forum/dm-crypt__47__LUKS_encryption_and_key_management/comment_3_a749abb97ebafd26bb695663b68673c5._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f4448ddf --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/dm-crypt__47__LUKS_encryption_and_key_management/comment_3_a749abb97ebafd26bb695663b68673c5._comment @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="david" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/22c2d800db6a7699139df604a67cb221" + subject="maybe some equivalent of CryptPassword" + date="2018-10-16T11:51:23Z" + content=""" +Storing plaintext luks passwords on disk doesn't sound great for most applications, but I wonder if the encrypted form could be stored in privdata. Something using e.g. \"cryptsetup luksDump\" or \"cryptsetup luksHeaderBackup\". I have no idea how practical it is to generate such data without being logged into the machine in question. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3 From 783dd77f8f03dbdf7ad6b8f1bb0c91402156aede Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas.Schodet Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 20:34:10 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- ...comment_8_2c604eb5c627c36ec68a1a7198e00710._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Adding_support_for_a_SQL_server/comment_8_2c604eb5c627c36ec68a1a7198e00710._comment (limited to 'doc') diff --git a/doc/forum/Adding_support_for_a_SQL_server/comment_8_2c604eb5c627c36ec68a1a7198e00710._comment b/doc/forum/Adding_support_for_a_SQL_server/comment_8_2c604eb5c627c36ec68a1a7198e00710._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0724001b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Adding_support_for_a_SQL_server/comment_8_2c604eb5c627c36ec68a1a7198e00710._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="Nicolas.Schodet" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/0d7ec808ec329d04ee9a93c0da3c0089" + subject="comment 8" + date="2018-10-19T20:34:10Z" + content=""" +Hello, + +I have made a second version. + +About reverting `installed`, I noticed that it only removes the meta package, which is quite useless. May be I should just drop revertability on this one. + +The problem of installing a software just to revert a property can also be seen in `Apache.modEnabled` for exemple. + +Any comments are welcome. + +Thanks. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3