From 55fc89ab22fc47b7a8bedff7c303e93348024bf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 15:03:29 -0400 Subject: comment --- ...ent_1_8a97e9ce919fa59f2e36bdd4eb3a7174._comment | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/use_stack_for_remote_building_propellor/comment_1_8a97e9ce919fa59f2e36bdd4eb3a7174._comment (limited to 'doc/todo/use_stack_for_remote_building_propellor') diff --git a/doc/todo/use_stack_for_remote_building_propellor/comment_1_8a97e9ce919fa59f2e36bdd4eb3a7174._comment b/doc/todo/use_stack_for_remote_building_propellor/comment_1_8a97e9ce919fa59f2e36bdd4eb3a7174._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..90dfafbc --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/use_stack_for_remote_building_propellor/comment_1_8a97e9ce919fa59f2e36bdd4eb3a7174._comment @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 1""" + date="2016-05-29T18:50:07Z" + content=""" +`stack install propellor` is already supported, and when `propellor --init` +detects it was installed that way, it will set up the user's propellor +config to also be built using stack locally (via `git config +propellor.buildsystem stack`). + +Supporting using stack to build propellor on the Host too is +the missing part, and something I'd take a patch for. + +Your patch as it stands discards the cabal support. +But, I personally want to continue building propellor with cabal on my +Hosts, at least until stack is available in Debian stable, and +probably longer. (I use Debian's ghc and haskell packages for other things +on my hosts, so using stack would waste disk space.) + +I feel there needs to be a way to configure this. It would probably be fine to +use stack on the remote host if the local propellor repository has +`git config propellor.buildsystem stack` set. Or perhaps it should be +configured in the config.hs. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3