From b2eb7434d5c95604b0326cbce6f72d8e8f2538e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: spwhitton Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:57:57 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- .../comment_6_db48a08bc6eece590aebd41691623665._comment | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/pull_request:_patch_Apt.buildDep_to_only_proceed_if_installable/comment_6_db48a08bc6eece590aebd41691623665._comment (limited to 'doc/todo/pull_request:_patch_Apt.buildDep_to_only_proceed_if_installable') diff --git a/doc/todo/pull_request:_patch_Apt.buildDep_to_only_proceed_if_installable/comment_6_db48a08bc6eece590aebd41691623665._comment b/doc/todo/pull_request:_patch_Apt.buildDep_to_only_proceed_if_installable/comment_6_db48a08bc6eece590aebd41691623665._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..85c91d65 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/pull_request:_patch_Apt.buildDep_to_only_proceed_if_installable/comment_6_db48a08bc6eece590aebd41691623665._comment @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="spwhitton" + subject="comment 6" + date="2015-12-02T04:57:57Z" + content=""" +Seems I blanked on your `changesFile` combinator when I sat down to write mine. Taking a look now, my approach is much more direct for cases like `Apt.buildDep` when the problem is registering a change when there should be NoChange, whereas I think the intention of your changesFile is the opposite case. Though it might be nice to combine them. Let me know what you think. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3