From 5333f3fb5c1a2ac6c16c8217c52ede2c7f03333f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:44:20 -0400 Subject: response --- ...ent_3_58d323602f293471ce3d2d9b4d271130._comment | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/todo/new_apt_pinning_properties/comment_3_58d323602f293471ce3d2d9b4d271130._comment (limited to 'doc/todo/new_apt_pinning_properties') diff --git a/doc/todo/new_apt_pinning_properties/comment_3_58d323602f293471ce3d2d9b4d271130._comment b/doc/todo/new_apt_pinning_properties/comment_3_58d323602f293471ce3d2d9b4d271130._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b0ff271e --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/new_apt_pinning_properties/comment_3_58d323602f293471ce3d2d9b4d271130._comment @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 3""" + date="2017-02-02T18:45:01Z" + content=""" +That example with reverting one property overriding another property +is a general problem propellor has with conflicting properties. +Normally I don't much worry about it, but I agree an accidental mass +upgrade is a good reason to avoid that problem here. + +Yes please add a new type alias for String (or an ADT) +if Package is not appropriate. + +I had misunderstood which function the TODO was for.. + +Nice surprise that tightenTargets works on RevertableProperty at all. +Since it does, you should be able to tighten one side, revert, tighten the +other side, and re-revert. Or, deconstruct the RevertableProperty, +tighten both sides individually, and reconstruct it. + +I've added a Propellor.Property.File.configFileName that +should be suitable for your purposes, and others.. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3