From 8c6b51e0fa82290990123bf6be92a4113045f598 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: david Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:10:57 +0000 Subject: --- doc/forum/ipv6_support_for_P.Property.Firewall.mdwn | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/ipv6_support_for_P.Property.Firewall.mdwn (limited to 'doc/forum/ipv6_support_for_P.Property.Firewall.mdwn') diff --git a/doc/forum/ipv6_support_for_P.Property.Firewall.mdwn b/doc/forum/ipv6_support_for_P.Property.Firewall.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4648e3d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/ipv6_support_for_P.Property.Firewall.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +would it make sense for Firewall.rule to call ip6tables as well as iptables? Or is a lower level interface with e.g. rule6 invoking ip6tables. To be honest I haven't tested ip6tables on machines without ipv6 support, so I don't know how gracefully it fails. -- cgit v1.2.3