From 9ec7f7856457916bbc7f1410143cb44213855f58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:42:13 -0400 Subject: comment --- ...comment_3_a1f7f5da5f01df715173294e83af0e10._comment | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/Experimental_propellor_augeas_intergration_+_workflow_concenrs/comment_3_a1f7f5da5f01df715173294e83af0e10._comment (limited to 'doc/forum/Experimental_propellor_augeas_intergration_+_workflow_concenrs') diff --git a/doc/forum/Experimental_propellor_augeas_intergration_+_workflow_concenrs/comment_3_a1f7f5da5f01df715173294e83af0e10._comment b/doc/forum/Experimental_propellor_augeas_intergration_+_workflow_concenrs/comment_3_a1f7f5da5f01df715173294e83af0e10._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..68061720 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/Experimental_propellor_augeas_intergration_+_workflow_concenrs/comment_3_a1f7f5da5f01df715173294e83af0e10._comment @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="joey" + subject="""comment 3""" + date="2015-09-25T13:37:34Z" + content=""" +I'm generally happy to accept new modules into propellor. However, this one +is problimatic since it adds several new dependencies. I want to keep +propellor's dependencies minimal. + +It could be integrated behind a flag in propellor.cabal, but then I'd need +to worry about testing it (or not testing it) for integration when there +are changes. + +So, maybe this works better as an addon module? A propellor user could then +add it to their config.hs. Only problem I see is, it currently depends on +propellor, so a user can't modify their propellor.cabal to depend on it. +So you'd have to use propellor as a library. +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3