From e1c51f16220904b9a9131e700791a68e7aeafdc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: picca Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 19:11:24 +0000 Subject: Added a comment --- ...nt_12_4baf7efcc6f9c50e3aebd663b7792279._comment | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/forum/DiskImage_creation_does_not_work_on_my_system/comment_12_4baf7efcc6f9c50e3aebd663b7792279._comment (limited to 'doc/forum/DiskImage_creation_does_not_work_on_my_system') diff --git a/doc/forum/DiskImage_creation_does_not_work_on_my_system/comment_12_4baf7efcc6f9c50e3aebd663b7792279._comment b/doc/forum/DiskImage_creation_does_not_work_on_my_system/comment_12_4baf7efcc6f9c50e3aebd663b7792279._comment new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b6de7d0a --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/forum/DiskImage_creation_does_not_work_on_my_system/comment_12_4baf7efcc6f9c50e3aebd663b7792279._comment @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +[[!comment format=mdwn + username="picca" + avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/7e61c80d28018b10d31f6db7dddb864c" + subject="comment 12" + date="2017-08-24T19:11:24Z" + content=""" +If I understand correctly, the new typeclass need to provide a method which return the +(RawDiskImage filename). In the process we have at least 2 cache level +One for the chroot, and one for the RawImage. + +I was wondering if these cache (side effect) could not be regrouped +under /var/cache/propellor instead of putting this randomly everywhere on the disk. + +This way It should be possible to \"reset\" propellor by removing the cache in order to force +a cache rebuild. + +I think about this because I am not aware as a user of all these \"side effects\". + +propellor --purge-cache ;) + +cheers and thanks again + +"""]] -- cgit v1.2.3