summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal.mdwn2
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal/comment_1_3009093e2ab7bcf9e60555da71796a63._comment10
2 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal.mdwn b/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal.mdwn
index 7e724c5a..90a0e8f8 100644
--- a/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal.mdwn
@@ -1 +1,3 @@
`propellor.cabal` claims that propellor is licensed under the 3-clause BSD license. `debian/copyright` says it's licensed under the 2-clause BSD license. Which is correct? An ftp-master noticed. Thanks. --spwhitton
+
+> [[fixed|done]] --[[Joey]]
diff --git a/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal/comment_1_3009093e2ab7bcf9e60555da71796a63._comment b/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal/comment_1_3009093e2ab7bcf9e60555da71796a63._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3ea7af89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/todo/License_in_propellor.cabal/comment_1_3009093e2ab7bcf9e60555da71796a63._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 1"""
+ date="2016-05-10T16:06:12Z"
+ content="""
+It's 2-clause, see LICENSE.
+
+Cabal file license fields are too restricted syntax to be more than
+a general indication of license in general I think.
+"""]]