summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/forum
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/forum')
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor.mdwn12
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor/comment_1_80f98aaf4927d834dc714faeae7bf167._comment16
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_3_e057fae70854f7323dafa0d79b327dec._comment11
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_4_916b6cae93e772fa0fac88676409b03a._comment8
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_6_79355b6df4dc750a4ea2e1e13f50dca8._comment7
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_7_6b9488d20a04bc25f2ba44391f4a0a47._comment8
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_8_ce37b55141120b3b6babebe14c1b1ec2._comment7
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_9_a84a0c6773c8b3df03c028b63814b3d8._comment9
8 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor.mdwn b/doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..094be12a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+Hello,
+
+First, thank you for your program and your work, it's very interesting. I'm trying to use it and I have two questions :
+
+
+1) Is there already some propellor code to deal with Ldap or should I write my own code ? (I didn't see anything in the API doc)
+
+2) Is it possible to use propellor with another folder than ~/.propellor/ ? (for exemple to deal with several "domains")
+
+Thank you,
+
+TobiasBora.
diff --git a/doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor/comment_1_80f98aaf4927d834dc714faeae7bf167._comment b/doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor/comment_1_80f98aaf4927d834dc714faeae7bf167._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7c8d9bbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Ldap_and_Propellor/comment_1_80f98aaf4927d834dc714faeae7bf167._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 1"""
+ date="2016-07-05T20:39:45Z"
+ content="""
+I don't think that anyone has integrated it with LDAP yet.
+
+It's easy to use propellor from another location; just put the propellor
+git repository anywhere you want, use `make` to build it once,
+and run `./propellor` thereafter.
+
+The only thing that hardcodes using ~/.propellor is the /usr/bin/propellor
+wrapper, by running the propellor you built yourself you bypass the need
+for the wrapper. I keep propellor in ~/src/propellor on my laptop
+and run it this way myself.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_3_e057fae70854f7323dafa0d79b327dec._comment b/doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_3_e057fae70854f7323dafa0d79b327dec._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5da15f09
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_3_e057fae70854f7323dafa0d79b327dec._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="weinzwang"
+ subject="Same problem with ssh.knownHost"
+ date="2016-07-24T15:47:25Z"
+ content="""
+Making a host key known to a brand new user `requires` the
+owner of a nonexistent file to be set, if I understand the
+code correctly. Removing the \"requires\"-lines from the function
+modKnownHost makes the problem go away, but that's probably not
+the correct solution.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_4_916b6cae93e772fa0fac88676409b03a._comment b/doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_4_916b6cae93e772fa0fac88676409b03a._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..36a31728
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/Ssh.authorizedKey_does_not_work_on_brand_new_user/comment_4_916b6cae93e772fa0fac88676409b03a._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 4"""
+ date="2016-07-24T17:35:24Z"
+ content="""
+I see it; changed it to use `before` so the file creation/modification
+comes before any chmodding.
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_6_79355b6df4dc750a4ea2e1e13f50dca8._comment b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_6_79355b6df4dc750a4ea2e1e13f50dca8._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6efc3fff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_6_79355b6df4dc750a4ea2e1e13f50dca8._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="gueux"
+ subject="comment 6"
+ date="2016-06-24T10:08:51Z"
+ content="""
+Ahhh! I didn't realize this, now it makes sense to me, thanks! maybe you could make withFile' available in propellor? (and maybe even override withFile)
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_7_6b9488d20a04bc25f2ba44391f4a0a47._comment b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_7_6b9488d20a04bc25f2ba44391f4a0a47._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a1e3ab6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_7_6b9488d20a04bc25f2ba44391f4a0a47._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="gueux"
+ subject="comment 7"
+ date="2016-06-24T10:24:16Z"
+ content="""
+Hopefully we will have MonadIO is base (and functions generalized) one day :)
+https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2015-July/026008.html
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_8_ce37b55141120b3b6babebe14c1b1ec2._comment b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_8_ce37b55141120b3b6babebe14c1b1ec2._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..18b94ff0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_8_ce37b55141120b3b6babebe14c1b1ec2._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="gueux"
+ subject="comment 8"
+ date="2016-06-24T10:29:09Z"
+ content="""
+Oh, MonadIO is actually in base. We \"just\" miss the generelized functions...
+"""]]
diff --git a/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_9_a84a0c6773c8b3df03c028b63814b3d8._comment b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_9_a84a0c6773c8b3df03c028b63814b3d8._comment
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f819337f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/use_withUmask_in_a_property/comment_9_a84a0c6773c8b3df03c028b63814b3d8._comment
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 9"""
+ date="2016-07-05T20:44:14Z"
+ content="""
+Yeah, it's a general problem with base that it's not sufficiently
+generalized. I suppose it's best not to add exported functions to propellor
+to work around that general problem.
+"""]]